The intercept-time method – possibilities and limitations
Main Article Content
In deep-seismic sounding the reflected and refracted waves recorded form a complex system of traveltime curves. The inverse seismic problem consists in determining the function ν (x, z) along the profile for a series of velocity levely ν (x, z) = const and discontinuities as well. This paper described a method which allows the transformation of observed traveltime curves into an intercept-time section with isolines of velocity. Such a section permits discrimination of the various types of waves and gives a qualitative picture of the crustal structure, and is then converted into a depth section. The application of this method is demonstrated by a number of examples from the Ukrainian Shield, the Tien Shan and the Caucasus showing both possibilities and restrictions.
Authors who publish with this journal as of Vol. 63 agree to the following terms:
a. Authors share the copyright with this journal in equal parts (50% to the journal, 50% to the lead author), and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal, and a reference to this copyright notice.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work and better sales of the copyright.
Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Geophysics right of first publication, with the work three years after publication simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 License that allows others to share the work (with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal), except for commercial purposes and for creating derivatives.
Authors can enter into separate, additional, but non-commercial contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, but not publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as that can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This journal is one of a handful of scholarly journals that publish original scientific works under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - the only Creative Commons license affording the authors' intellectual property absolute worldwide protection.
Journal of Geophysics is published under the scholar-publishers model, meaning authors do not surrender their copyright to us. Instead, and unlike corporate publishers like Elsevier or Springer Nature that resell copyright to third-parties for up to $80,000 (per paper, per transaction!), the Journal of Geophysics authors share copyright equally with this journal.
Therefore, all the proceeds from reselling copyright to third parties get shared to equal parts (50% to the journal, 50% to the lead author). Under the Berne Convention, this protection is an inheritable right that lasts for as long as the rightsholder lives + 50 years.
By submitting to this journal, the lead author, on behalf of all co-authors, grants permission to this journal to represent all co-authors in negotiating copyright sales and collecting proceeds. The lead author should negotiate with his/her co-authors the modalities of distributing the lead author's portion of the proceeds. Usually, this is per pre-agreed percentage of each co-author's contribution to creating the copyrighted work. (more...)
Bamford, D. (1973) Refraction data in western Germany - a timeterm interpretation, J. Geophys. 39:907-927
Barthelmes, A.J. (1946) Application of continuous profiling to refraction shooting. Geophysics 11:24-42
Barry, K.M. (1967) Delay time and its application to refraction profile interpretation. In: Musgrave, A.W. (Ed.) Seismic refraction prospecting, Tulsa, Soc. of Epl. Geophysicists, 348-362
Bessanova, E.N., Fishman, V.M., Riaboyi, V.Z., Sitnikova, G.A. (1974) The r-method for inversion of travel times, I. Deep seismic sounding data, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 36:377-398
Červeny, V., Molotkov, I.A., Pšenčik, I. (1977) Ray method in seismology, Charles University Press, Prague
Fuchs, K., Muller, G. (1971) Computation of synthetic seismograms with the reflectivity method and comparison with observations, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 23:417-433
Gamburtsev, G.A., Riznichenko, Yu.V., Berzon, LS., Yepinatyeva, A.M., Pasechnik, J.P., Kosminskaya, J.P., Karns, E.V. (1939) Correlation method of refractions, Acad. Sci. USSR Press, Moscow 1952 (in Russian) Gardner, L.W.: An areal plan of mapping subsurface structure by refraction shooting Geophysics 4:247-259
Gardner, L.W. (1967) Refraction seismograph interpretation. In: Musgrave, A.W. (Ed.) Seismic refraction prospecting, Tulsa, Soc. Expl. Geophysicists, pp. 338-347
Giese, P. (1976) Depth calculation. In: Giese, P., Prodehl, C., Stein, A. (Eds.) Explosion seismology in Central Europe, Springer, Berlin 146-161
Hagedoorn, J.G. (1959) The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections. Geophys. Prospecting 7:158-182
Hubral, P. (1977) Time migration - Some ray theoretical aspects. Geophys. Prospecting 25:739-745
Kondratiev, O.K., Gamburtsev, A.G. (1963) Seismic investigation in coastal part of Eastern Antartic. Nauka, Moscow
Konovalzev, J. (1980) The Donbass. In: Zverev, S.M., Kosminskaya, I.P. (Eds.) Seismic models of the main geostructures in the USSR territory. Nauka, Moscow (In Russian)
Matveeva, N.N. (1968) Computer algorithm and the method of velocity model determination. In: Problems of the dynamic theory of the seismic waves 9, Nauka, Leningrad (In Russian)
Oblogina, T.I. (1979) Two-dimensional problems. In: Inverse kinematic problems of explosion seismology, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 66-75 (In Russian)
Orcutt, I.A. (1980) Joint linear, extremal inversion of seismic kinematic data. J. Geophys. Res. 85:2649-2660
Pavlenkova, N.I. (1973) Interpretation of refracted waves by the reduced travel time curve method. Physics of the Solid Earth 8:544-550
Pavlenkova, N.I., Pšenčik, I. (1977) Mathematical modelling as a method of solving the two-dimensional seismic problem. Publ. Inst. Geophys. Pol. Acad. Sci., A-4(115):267-275
Pilipenko, V.N. (1979 ) Numerical time field method in the seismic interface construction. In: Inverse kinematic problems of explosion seismology, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 124-178 (In Russian)
Pšenčik, J. (1979) Ray amplitudes of compressional shear, and converted seismic body waves in 3 D laterally inhomogeneous media with curved interfaces. J. Geophys. 45:381-390
Puzirev, N.N., Krylov, S.V., Mishenkin, B.P. (1975) Methods of regional seismic investigations, Nauka, Novosibirsk (In Russian)
Riznichenko, Yu.V. (1946) Geometrical seismics of layered media, Trudy Inst. Teor. Geofiz., Vol. 2, Acad. Sci. USSR Press, Moscow (in Russian)
Romanov, M.E., Alekseev, A.S. (1980) A characteristic method for numerical solution of the inverse kinematic seismic problems. J. Geophys. 48:173-180
Shazilov, V.I. (1980) Tien-Shan. In: Zverev, S.M., Kosminskaja, I.P. (Ed.) Seismic models of the main geostructures in the USSR territory. Nauka, Moscow (In Russian)
Thornburgh, H.R. (1930) Wavefront diagrams in seismic interpretation. Bull. A.A.P.G. 14:185-200
Willmore, P.L., Bancroft, A.M. (1960) The time-term approach to refraction seismology. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 3:419-432
Wyrobek, S.M. (1956) Application of delay and intercept times in the interpretation of multilayer refraction time distance curves. Geophys. Prospecting 4:112-130