Main Article Content
As a contribution to the International Magnetospheric Study the University of Munster has installed an array of 32 Gough-Reitzel type magnetometers located mostly in Northern Scandinavia. Also for the IMS, the Max Planck Institute for Aeronomy at Lindau is operating the Scandinavian Twin Auroral Radar Experiment (STARE) which consists of two nearly identical backscatter radars located near Trondheim (Norway) and Sauvamaki (Finland). For a weak isolated substorm on October 7, 1976 the spatial structure of the electron density irregularities observed by the Trondheim-radar and the equivalent current distribution derived from the agnetic measurements have been compared. A good correspondence has been found between the location and magnitude of the maxima of the horizontal magnetic disturbance and the radar backscatter amplitude for an eastward electrojet. For most of the comparison there appeared also to be good agreement between the direction of the equivalent current and the direction antiparallel to the line-of-sight irregularity drift. This supports the idea that the backscatter irregularities are caused by current driven plasma instabilities and that it is possible to determine auroral ionospheric currents with the backscatter radar technique. However, during periods of enhanced electron precipitation, differences between the drift directions given by the two methods were observed.
Authors who publish with this journal as of Vol. 63 agree to the following terms:
a. Authors share the copyright with this journal in equal parts (50% to the journal, 50% to the lead author), and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal, and a reference to this copyright notice.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work and better sales of the copyright.
This journal is one of a handful of scholarly journals that publish original scientific works under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - the only Creative Commons license affording absolute worldwide protection of authors' intellectual property.
Journal of Geophysics is published under the scholar-publishers model, meaning authors do not surrender their copyright to us. Instead, and unlike corporate publishers like Elsevier or Springer Nature which resell the copyright to third-parties for up to $80,000 (per paper, per transaction!), the Journal of Geophysics authors share the copyright equally with this journal.
Therefore all the proceeds from reselling the copyright to third parties are shared to equal parts as well (50% to the journal, 50% to the lead author). Under the Berne Convention, this protection is an inheritable right which lasts for as long as the rightsholder lives + 50 years.
By submitting to this journal, the lead author on behalf of all co-authors grants permission to this journal to represent all co-authors in negotiating copyright sales and collecting of proceeds. The lead author should negotiate with his/her co-authors the modalities of distributing the lead author's portion of the proceeds. Usually, this is per pre-agreed percentage of each co-author's contribution to creating the copyrighted work. (more...)
Ecklund, W. L., Balsley, B.B., Carter, D.A. (1977) A preliminary comparison of F region plasma drifts and E region irregularity drifts in the auroral zone. J. Geophys. Res. 82:195-197
Farley, D.J. (1963) A plasma instability resulting in field-aligned irregularities in the ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 68:6083-6097
Fukushima, N. (1976) Generalized theorem for no ground magnetic effect of vertical currents connccted with Pedersen currents in the uniform conductivity ionosphere. Rept. Ionos. Space Res. Japan 3O:35-40
Gough, D.I., Reitzel, J.S. (1967) A portable three component magnetic variometer. J. Geomag. Geoclectr. 19:203-215
Greenwald, R.A., Ecklund, W.L., Balsley, B.B. (1973) Auroral currents, irregularities, and luminosity. J. Geophys. Res. 78:8193-8203
Greenwald, R.A., Ecklung, W.L., Balsley, B.B. (1975) Radar observations of auroral currents. J. Geophys. Res. 80:3635-3641
Gustafsson, G. (1970) A revised corrected geomagnetic coordinate system. Ark. Geofys. 5:595-6l7
Harang, L. (1946) The mean field of distubance of polar geomagnetic storms. Terr. Magn. Atmos. Elec. 51:353-380
Kamide, Y., Brekke, A. (1977) Altitude of the eastward und westward auroral electrojets. J. Geophys. Res. 82:2851-2853
Kuppers, F., Untiedt, J., Baumjohann, W. (1978) A two-dimensional array for ground-based observations of auroral zone electritc currents during the IMS. Submitted to J. Geophys.
Rogister, A., D'Angelo, N. (1970) Type II irregularities in the equatorial electrojet. J. Geophys. Res. 75:3879-3887
Siren, J.C., Doupnik, J.R., Ecklund, W.I. (1977) Comparison of auroral currents measured by the Chatanika radar with 50 MHz backscatter observed from Anchorage. J. Geophys. Res. 82(25):3577
Stauning, P., Christensen, B. (1977) Compilation of Ionlab riometer data for IMS-Workshop in Hankasalmi. Ionlab Rep. R41. Lyngby (Denmark)
Tsunoda, R.T., Presnell, R.I., Kamide. Y., Akasofu, S.-I. (1976) Relationship or radar aurora, visual aurora, and electrojets in the evening sector. J. Geophys. Res. 81:6005-6015