Main Article Content
A method is described for calculating the seismic response of an arbitrarily shaped interface below a homogeneous medium by the Kirchhoff integral in the time domain. It is shown, by comparison with other numerical techniques, that this method yields accurate results for reflections. The errors in calculating diffractions are tolerable if the distance of the receiver from the shadow boundary of reflection is not too large; this is usually the case in horizontal seismic profiling. The method has been applied to model qualitatively some typical features in record sections of the deep seismic reflection profile DEKORP2-S. This profile is characterized by numerous strongly curved events that are concentrated mainly in two areas of the profile. These signals can be addressed as diffractions from an interpretation of the travel times. Dynamic calculations, however, show that the surprisingly high amplitudes cannot be explained by diffracting elements like fault edges or small-scale inhomogeneities; instead, one has to assume cylindrically or spherically curved reflectors with a radius of at least 4 km. Some possible geological explanations for these structures, like diapiric intrusions or antiformal stacks, are discussed in view of the tectonic evolution of the Central European Variscides.
Authors who publish with this journal as of Vol. 63 agree to the following terms:
a. Authors share the copyright with this journal in equal parts (50% to the journal, 50% to the lead author), and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal, and a reference to this copyright notice.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work and better sales of the copyright.
Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Geophysics right of first publication, with the work two years after publication simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 License that allows others to share the work (with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal), except for commercial purposes and for creating derivatives.
Authors can enter into separate, additional, but non-commercial contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, but not publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as that can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This journal is one of a handful of scholarly journals that publish original scientific works under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - the only Creative Commons license affording the authors' intellectual property absolute worldwide protection.
Journal of Geophysics is published under the scholar-publishers model, meaning authors do not surrender their copyright to us. Instead, and unlike corporate publishers like Elsevier or Springer Nature that resell copyright to third-parties for up to $80,000 (per paper, per transaction!), the Journal of Geophysics authors share copyright equally with this journal.
Therefore, all the proceeds from reselling copyright to third parties get shared to equal parts (50% to the journal, 50% to the lead author). Under the Berne Convention, this protection is an inheritable right that lasts for as long as the rightsholder lives + 50 years.
By submitting to this journal, the lead author, on behalf of all co-authors, grants permission to this journal to represent all co-authors in negotiating copyright sales and collecting proceeds. The lead author should negotiate with his/her co-authors the modalities of distributing the lead author's portion of the proceeds. Usually, this is per pre-agreed percentage of each co-author's contribution to creating the copyrighted work. (more...)
Berryhill, J.R. (1977) Diffraction response for nonzero separation of source and receiver. Geophysics 42(6):1158-1176
Blundell, D.J., Raynaud, B. (1986) Modeling lower crust reflections observed on BI RPS profiles. In: Barazangi, M., Brown, L. (Eds.) Reflection seismology: a global perspective, pp. 287-295. AGU Geodynamics Series, Vol. 13, Washington D.C.
Carter, J.A., Frazer, L.N. (1983) A method for modeling reflection data from media with lateral velocity changes. J. Geophys. Res. 88:6469-6476
DEKORP Research Group (1985) First results and preliminary interpretation of deep-reflection seismic recordings along profile DEKORP2-South. J. Geophys. 57:137-163
Deregowski, S.M., Brown, S.M. (1983) A theory of acoustic diffractors applied to 2-D models. Geophys. Prosp. 31:293-333
Edel, J.B. (1982) Le socle varisque de l'Europe moyenne apports du magnetisme et de la gravimetrie. Sci. Geol. Bull. 35:207-224
Fertig, J., Muller, G. (1979) Approximate diffraction theory for transparent half-planes with application to seismic-wave diffraction at coal seams. J. Geophys. 46:349-367
Frazer, L.N., Sen, M.K. (1985) Kirchhoff-Helmholtz reflection seismograms in a laterally inhomogeneous multi-layered elastic medium - I. Theory. Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc. 80:121-147
Hilterman, F.J. (1970) Three-dimensional seismic modeling. Geophysics 35(6):1020-1037
Hutton, G.D. (1987) The perfectly reflecting wedge used as a control model in seismic diffraction modelling. Geophys. Prosp. 35:681-699
Matthews, D.H., Cheadle, M.J. (1986) Deep reflections from the Caledonides and Variscides west of Britain and comparison with the Himalayas. In: Barazangi, M., Brown, L. (Eds.) Reflection seismology: a global perspective, pp. 5-19. AGU Geodynamics series, Vol. 13, Washington D.C.
Muller, G. (1977) Earth-flattening approximation for body waves derived from geometric ray theory - improvements, corrections and range of applicability. 1. Geo phys. 42:429-436
Schilt, F.W., Kaufman, S., Long, G.H. (1981) A three-dimensional study of seismic diffraction patterns from deep basement sources. Geophysics 46(12):1673-1683
Schneider, W.A. (1978) Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimensions. Geophysics 43:49-76
Sen, K.S., Frazer, L.N. (1985) Kirchhoff-Helmholtz reflection seismograms in a laterally inhomogeneous multi-layered elastic medium - II. Computations. Geoph. J.R. Astron. Soc. 82:415-437
Setto, I., Meissner, R. (1986) Support of gravity modelling for seismic interpretation. Terra Cognita 6:346
Sullivan, M.F., Cohen, J.K. (1987) Prestack Kirchhoff inversion of common-offset data. Geophysics 52(6):745-754
Temme, P. (1984) A comparison of common-midpoint, single-shot, and plane wave depth migration. Geophysics 49, 1896--1907
Trorey, AW. (1970) A simple theory for seismic diffractions. Geophysics 35(5), 762-784
Trorey, AW. (1977) Diffractions for arbitrary source-receiver locations. Geophysics 42(6), 1177-1182
Weber, K. (1984) Variscan events: early Palaeozoic continental rift metamorphism and late Palaeozoic crustal shortening. In: Hutton, D.H.W., Sanderson, D.J. (Eds.) Variscan tectonics of the North Atlantic region, pp. 3-22. Special publication of the Geological Society. Blackwell, Oxford